Bank of America and Countrywide Deal in Trouble?

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but it seems there might be a problem here. Does B of A really want all the liability that is coming from Countrywide? I personally blame Countrywide for a lot of the problems going on in the mortgage industry, and quite frankly the economy. They gave many people loans that should of never gotten them. Here is a spot from Jim Cramer on his views on the B of A merger with CW. He makes an ominous comment about one and a half minutes into his thing. Enjoy. http://www.thestreet.com/video/10406994/index.html#10406994

Option Arms?

The option arms that are surviving the mortgage wars are actually pretty good. These are very distant cousins to the ones that everybody is in trouble with. The really good ones work like this: The minimum payment is from 3% to 4%, this keeps you from building up too much defered interest too fast. You can get a fixed rate around 8% or less, so you are not at the mercy of the market. They offer stated income options for situations that make sense. You can get these for investment, primary, and secondary residences. If you use them right, you can actually pay off your property sooner than with a regular mortgage.

Big Banks in Trouble

Big banks have only themselves to blame on this one. They entered markets and bought local community banks and for the most part erased any connection and duty they had to the local community. When a "big bank" takes over a local bank a number of things happen. All the money the bank kept locally was sent to another "central location"in another state. Most of the existing staff is let go and college "wannabees" were hired who have no clue past checking or savings accounts. They were hired and trained to sell the "product of the day" rather than what was best for the borrower. Then the local "trust" accounts were taken to a "central location" and, here a crime, the new managers of the trusts would then decide where the trust money would go, and often it wasn't what the trust was set up for initially. Example, there was a couple in Texas that saved all their lives and donated millions to a trust to support their favorite charity. A "big bank" came in and bought the local bank that was managing the trust. The "big bank" decided that the trust wasn't making enough money (the managers of the trust get paid on how much money the trust makes), so they stopped giving to the charity the trust was set up for. WOW! Now if the bank had been under local ownership and management it would of never happened.

Go into a bank today and go back in 30 days and see how many of the same people are still there. I worked for a year at a "big bank" as a mortgage loan officer and I was assigned a couple of branches to call on. I felt so sorry for the people at the branch. They were so overworked and under appreciated. Every day they would have their priorities by upper management changed, so in reality nobody could get ahead and people were constantly being shuffled around. It was like the bank didn't want anybody to become too good at their job.

Then came the mortgage mess. Where were the regulators during all of this? I saw a couple of them testifying on Capitol Hill and they sure didn't look smart to me. I never saw so many dumb looks in my life as I did that day. Whose money did the banks loose? Where did they get this kind of money to play with? Why does it seem that all their money was in mortgages? Why weren't they investing in their local communities by loaning money to businesses? Why aren't they responsible to the local community.

It seems to me that if we are going to allow "big banks" then they have to be held much more accountible for their actions. Otherwise I am all for eliminating "branch banking" and going back to much smaller and more responsible banks in this country.

Countrywide Junket Called Off

Seems our friends at Countrywide have cancelled their junket to Florida. Seems the Bank Of America money didn't include expensive junkets for Countrywide execs. Stay tuned for more.

My Radio Spot (click here for spot)

Here is my radio spot that we recently recorded with Star 107.9 here is Sarasota, Fl. They are a classic radio station and you can listen to them at http://www.oldies108.com/.

From Our Friends at Countrywide

Thursday, 28 Feb 2008
Countrywide Chooses Sun Over Ski Trip!
OriginallyPosted By:Jane Wells Funny Business

I've been hearing from sources that Countrywide, despite cancelling an expensive ski junket to Colorado, is planning two even bigger events in Hollywood, Fla.
Now comes confirmation from a source at The Westin Diplomat Resort & Spa that Countrywide Financial has booked the location for two different events, one starting next Wednesday -- lasting a week -- the second, happening at the end of April.
Those familiar with the details say the first event is for 300 people, the second event will be much larger. Who's coming and why, I don't know. Is it for clients? Countrywide employees? People being foreclosed on? Florida has one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation.
We have asked Countrywide for information -- and to confirm whether the trips are still on -- but haven't heard back yet.
The Westin Diplomat is described as a resort with "luxurious accommodations, magnificent views, and an experience sure to inspire renewal." Rooms start at $400 a night (yes, that's where they start), but can go up to $1,000 for a "Club Floor Suite."
One source tells me Countrywide spends "about $4,000 per guest and $5-6 million combined," and that the events include "parties/dinner every day, celebrity entertainment, activities, suite upgrades, private jet usage for execs, gifts, etc., etc."
I'll let you know what the company says, if anything. It has not responded to our questions recently.

Short Sales

Here is the scoop on short sales. A short sale is when you sell your house or the bank in a foreclosure action sells your home for less than you own on it. In the old days, (pre-2008), when this happened at the end of the year you got a pleasant (NOT!) surprise from your lender of a 1099 for the short sale amount. For example: You owed $200,000 on your mortgage and only for $150,000 for it. In the clear, NO! Under the old rules you would have to treat the $50,000 difference as income at the end of the year. YIKES! Under the new rules, that doesn't happen anymore. HOWEVER, this only applies to your PRINCIPLE RESIDENCE! People that walk away or are foreclosed on their investment property and end up with a short sale, THEY WILL GET STUCK PAYING TAX ON THAT MONEY! If you think the bank was tough, wait till you see what the IRS will do if you don't pay it.

The GOOD NEWS on this rule is that you don't get nailed with a double whammy of loosing your home and then a HUGE tax liability. The BAD NEWS is that many people who are not in danger of loosing their homes, are using this "help out" as an way to walk away from a home that has lost value in this market. Those people should be prosecuted. Why you ask? Well when they dump their homes out of selfishness, they are hurting the values of the homes around them. There are whole straits of homes in Detroit that are just empty! Me think that we are creating a self fullfilling prophecy.

My advice to people is to stick it out and ride the wave.